ABSTRACT
Objective:To compare the effect of intracorporeal anastamosis and extracorporeal anastamosis on abdominal infection associated with laparoscopic right hemicolectomy.Methods:The clinical data of 210 patients with colon cancer who underwent laparoscopic right hemicolectomy in Dalian Third Peoples′s Hospital, Liaoning Province from January 2015 to December 2019 were analyzed retrospectively.Among them, 79 patients underwent intracorporeal anastamosis (intracorporeal anastamosis group) and 131 patients underwent extracorporeal anastamosis (extracorporeal anastamosis group). The perioperative indexes and postoperative abdominal infection were compared between the two groups.Results:In intracorporeal anastamosis group, the intraoperative bleeding was (45.2±4.2) mL, the operative time was (161.3±22.4) min, the number of lymph node dissection was (30.8±9.6), the postoperative exhaust time was (3.3±1.2) d, and the postoperative hospital stay was (7.6±0.5) d. In extracorporeal anastamosis group was (42.1±5.0) mL, (167.3±26.7) min, (32.9±8.6), (3.4±1.0) d and (7.5±0.6) d, respectively, there were no significant difference between the two groups (t value were 0.417, 0.207, 0.829, 0.338 and 0.293, respectively; P value were 0.699, 0.845, 0.231, 0.734 and 0.802, respectively). In intracorporeal anastamosis group, the incidence of abdominal infection (with anastomotic fistula)was 13.9%(11/79), the incidence of abdominal infection (without anastomotic fistula)was 10.1%(8/79), and in extracorporeal anastamosis group was 1.5%(2/131)and 0.8%(1/131), the differences were statistically significant (χ 2=12.805, 10.238; P=0.003, 0.008). In intracorporeal anastamosis group, the incidence of respiratory system infection was 1.3%(1/79), the incidence of urinary system infection was 2.5%(2/79), the incidence of surgical incision infection was 1.3%(1/79). In extracorporeal anastamosis group was 3.1%(4/131), 0.8%(1/131) and 3.1%(4/131), respectively.There were no significant difference between the two groups (χ 2 value were 0.662, 0.420 and 0.662, respectively; P value were 0.364, 0.587 and 0.364, respectively). Conclusion:Laparoscopic right hemicolectomy with intracorporeal anastamosis and extracorporeal anastamosis have the same surgical effect, but intracorporeal anastamosis may increase the risk of postoperative abdominal infection.
ABSTRACT
Objective:To compare the effect of midcaudal combined approach and the cephalic middle approach in laparoscopic complete mesocolic excision (CME) in the treatment of right colon cancer complicated with incomplete intestinal obstruction.Methods:From January 2014 to January 2019, 90 patients with right colon cancer complicated with incomplete intestinal obstruction admitted to the Third People′s Hospital of Dalian were retrospectively analyzed.All patients underwent laparoscopic right hemicolectomy, CME plus D3 lymph node dissection.According to the choice of different surgical approaches, 44 patients were treated with the midcaudal combined approach (observation group) and the other 46 patients were treated with cephalic middle approach (control group). The intraoperative, postoperative and complications of the two groups were compared statistically.Results:Compared with the control group, the bleeding volume in the observation group was significantly reduced ((105.3±22.6) ml vs.(309.6±28.0) ml, t=13.698), the operation time was significantly shortened ((165.2±17.9) min vs.(219.5±21.5) min, t=8.327), and the differences were statistically significant (all P<0.05). There were no significant differences in the number of lymph nodes dissected ((21.4±7.8)vs.(20.4±6.6), t=0.534), the proportion of lymph nodes dissected≥12(86.4%(38/44)vs.84.8%(39/46), χ 2=0.208), the complications after operation(6.8%(3/44)vs.10.9%(5/46), χ 2=0.318), the length of hospital stay after operation ((11.8±1.6) d vs.(12.5±2.3) d, t=0.986), the difference was statistically significant (all P>0.05). Conclusion:It is safe and feasible to use the middle caudal approach in laparoscopic CME for right colon cancer complicated with incomplete ileus. Compared with the cephalic middle approach, it can reduce thebleeding volume and shorten the operation time.
ABSTRACT
<p><b>OBJECTIVE</b>To compare the postoperative analgesia efficacy, rehabilitation parameters and complication between multimodal analgesia and traditional analgesia after radical gastrectomy for gastric cancer patients.</p><p><b>METHODS</b>Patients with gastric cancer who underwent surgery in our hospital from October 2016 to December 2016 were enrolled in this prospective study. According to the non-randomized method, patients were assigned to multimodal analgesia group(n=32) and traditional analgesia group(n=33) in gastric cancer treatment team A and B in Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University. The treatment measures of group A were as follows: (1) The ratio of 1/1 diluted ropivacaine (100 mg, 10 ml) was infiltrated around the incision before abdomen closure, with incision sutured layer by layer. (2) Parecoxib sodium (40 mg) was injected intravenously every 12 hours after operation for 5 days. (3) Oxycodone-acetaminophen tablet was given orally on the first day or the second day after operation, 50 mg twice a day. (4) Patient-controlled analgesia was not used after operation. Patients in group B received direct suture of incision and patient-controlled analgesia. The pain score, postoperative rehabilitation and 30-day postoperative complications were collected and analyzed.</p><p><b>RESULTS</b>Multimodal analgesia group had lower pain scores at 1 d (4.8±0.9), 2 d (4.3±1.0), 3 d (2.9±0.8), 4 d (2.4±0.7) and 5 d (1.7±0.7) after surgery, as compared to traditional analgesia group (5.9±0.9, P=0.000), (5.1±0.7, P=0.001), (3.9±0.8, P=0.000), (3.0±0.6, P=0.000), (2.6±0.7, P=0.000), with significant difference. Postoperative hospital stay [(8.2±1.6) days vs. (10.6±2.2) days, P=0.000], time to ambulation [(47.5±13.8) days vs. (66.2±16.8) days, P=0.000], time to first flatus [(76.4±25.2) days vs. (120.0±29.9) days, P=0.000], time to first defecate [(117.3±42.2) days vs. (159.7±30.7) days, P=0.000] and time to first fluid diet [(83.8±21.6) days vs. (141.9±33.9) days, P=0.000] in the multimodal analgesia group were significantly shorter than those in the traditional analgesia group. There was no significant difference between the two groups with respect to 30-day postoperative complication rate(9.4% vs. 9.1%, P=1.000).</p><p><b>CONCLUSIONS</b>Multimodal analgesia can significantly reduce the postoperative pain and is beneficial to rehabilitation, meanwhile it does not increase the risk of postoperative complications. Multimodal analgesia is safe and effective for gastric cancer patients undergoing radical gastrectomy.</p>